Are you an entrepreneur entering into a commercial collaboration - such as a franchise, distribution, agency, or concession - and granting the other party the right to use your commercial formula (think of a shared trade name, transfer of know-how, or commercial/technical assistance)? Then you are legally obliged to thoroughly inform your (future) partner in advance. Recently, this duty to inform has been expanded and tightened by the legislator. This obligation to inform is not optional: failure to comply can lead to serious sanctions.

Before signing an agreement, you must provide your contracting partner with two documents:
1. The draft collaboration agreement
2. The pre-contractual information document (PID)
The PID is the central document and consists of two parts, which must include at least the following information:
Is an existing collaboration being extended or modified? Then a simplified PID is sufficient, but this must also be provided at least one month in advance. In such cases, it suffices to include the new or amended contractual provisions.
The law is strict: if you do not (timely) provide the PID or if it is incomplete, your partner can challenge the validity of the contractual provisions not included in the PID within two years — or even invoke the nullity of the entire agreement. This means the agreement will be considered as never having existed.
Consequences: You must repay all received fees (such as royalties or entry fees) and may also have to pay additional compensation for costs and investments made. Think of costs to suppliers and utility companies, investments in retail space, recruitment costs and paid salaries, interest on business loans, …
These rules are designed to protect the weaker party – but they also protect you as an entrepreneur from disputes later on. A correct and complete PID ensures transparency and avoids unpleasant surprises.
Do you have questions or need assistance drafting or reviewing your PID? The commercial law team at Andersen in Belgium is ready to assist you with this.
I am looking for a specialist in

12.11.2025
•Urban Planning and Environmental Law
The Council for Permit Disputes (RvVb) confirms that permanent residence is not a requirement for inclusion as a dwelling in the permit register. It is sufficient that the construction is primarily intended for residential use. A request for inclusion in the permit register may therefore not be refused on the grounds that permanent residence has not been demonstrated.

07.11.2025
•Urban Planning and Environmental Law
The Council for Permit Disputes (RvVb) annulled, on 9 October 2025, a financial charge imposed in a decision granting an environmental permit. Such a charge may, since 2024, only be imposed on the basis of an urban planning regulation within the meaning of Articles 2.3.1 and 2.3.2 of the Flemish Code for Spatial Planning (VCRO). Prior to the amendment of the Decree, the Environmental Permit Decree did provide that such a financial charge could be imposed by the permitting authority and under what conditions, but it was not required that a regulation be included in an urban planning ordinance.

06.11.2025
•Administrative Law and Public Procurement
Local authorities face a dilemma: they want to invest in public construction projects, but are no longer allowed to assess their own projects when these have a significant impact on the environment. A new draft decree aims to break the deadlock, but at the same time raises questions about how independent the assessment will really be when it is simply shifted to another political level.

04.11.2025
•Administrative Law and Public Procurement
On October 23, 2025, the new European threshold amounts that tighten public procurement regulations were published in the European Official Journal. When awarding public procurements, the contracting authority must take into account a number of threshold amounts.