The Council for Permit Disputes (RvVb) annulled, on 9 October 2025, a financial charge imposed in a decision granting an environmental permit. Such a charge may, since 2024, only be imposed on the basis of an urban planning regulation within the meaning of Articles 2.3.1 and 2.3.2 of the Flemish Code for Spatial Planning (VCRO). Prior to the amendment of the Decree, the Environmental Permit Decree did provide that such a financial charge could be imposed by the permitting authority and under what conditions, but it was not required that a regulation be included in an urban planning ordinance.

Decision RvVb 9 October 2025, No. RvVb-A-2526-0090
A financial charge is an additional obligation imposed in the context of an environmental permit, under which the applicant pays an amount to compensate for the impact of the permitted project. This amount may then be invested by the government in tasks it undertakes, such as the creation of green spaces or infrastructure works. In the case before the Council for Permit Disputes, the financial charge concerned a measure in support of complementary housing policy implemented by the city of Vilvoorde, including the provision of additional school capacity, green areas, and play and recreational spaces, which become necessary when large residential projects are realized.
Such charges may be imposed in a decision on an application for an environmental permit. Since the amendment of Article 75 of the Environmental Permit Decree by the Instruments Decree of 23 May 2023, effective from 1 January 2024, a charge may only be imposed if it is provided for in a regulation that complies with the rules set out in Articles 2.3.1 and 2.3.2 VCRO. These articles establish the formal and procedural requirements that such a regulation must meet, including the organization of a public inquiry.
The requirement that a regulation be included in an ordinance within the meaning of Articles 2.3.1 and 2.3.2 VCRO is justified by the legislator on the grounds of legal certainty and predictability whenever such a financial charge is imposed. In addition, the authority imposing the charge must justify it in light of the spatial policy it pursues.
In April 2024, a developer obtained an environmental permit for a residential project. The project consisted of several multi-family dwellings in three buildings, totaling 43 residential units, eight single-family homes, and one unit for office, service, or liberal profession purposes. The environmental permit was accompanied by a financial charge based on a municipal ordinance of 2017, amounting to €204.000.
The developer contested this charge, arguing, inter alia, that it could no longer be validly imposed under the 2017 ordinance because it does not comply with the provisions of Articles 2.3.1 and 2.3.2 VCRO.
Before addressing the merits of the case, the Council considered whether the financial charge was separable from the permit and therefore could be challenged independently. In this case, the Council concluded that it was indeed a charge within the meaning of Article 75 of the Environmental Permit Decree and a decision separable from the permit, so it could be contested independently.
The crux of the dispute concerned whether the imposed charge could still be validly imposed on the basis of the old municipal ordinance, as the application was submitted before 1 January 2024.
The Council ruled that the new Article 75 of the Environmental Permit Decree applies to all permits as of 1 January 2024, including those submitted before that date. Consequently, the Council for Permit Disputes annulled the imposed financial charge.
Both municipalities and applicants should verify whether the financial charge imposed is indeed based on a regulation within the meaning of Articles 2.3.1 and 2.3.2 VCRO.
For any further questions or assistance regarding environmental permits and the associated financial charges, you can contact Andersen in Belgium (Real Estate team).
Yves Sacreas (Senior Counsel) and Lara Van Dyck (Associate)
I am looking for a specialist in

01.06.2026
•Tax Law, Andersen in Belgium
Nearly a year after its entry into force, the DLUquinquies is beginning to yield its first practical insights, in particular through the updated FAQ published by the FPS Finance on 24 April 2026.

13.05.2026
•Corporate Law and M&A, Andersen in Belgium
With the EU Inc. proposal, the European Commission is taking an important step towards a more modern and integrated European business environment. The idea is simple, yet ambitious: to create a corporate framework that would coexist alongside existing national company forms and allow businesses to operate across the European Union in a simpler, faster and more digital way.

13.05.2026
•Tax Law, Andersen in Belgium
In October 2021, over 135 jurisdictions agreed, under the OECD/G20 Inclusive Framework on BEPS, to introduce a global minimum effective corporate tax rate of 15%. This framework — commonly referred to as Pillar Two — targets large multinational groups and aims to ensure that their profits are subject to a minimum level of taxation in every jurisdiction where they operate.

13.05.2026
•Tax Law, Andersen in Belgium
1 May 2026 marked the definitive abolition of the current VAT account, which has now been replaced by the VAT provision account.