This article takes a closer look at the conditions under which the heirs of a deceased lessee can continue the farming lease.

The rules provided for in the Farming Lease Law for when the lessee dies are taken over in the Farming Lease Decree, albeit with some legalistic and linguistic adjustments.
In principle, the farming lease continues in favour of the heirs or successors unless:
The rules for continued operation by the heirs of the deceased lessee, as contained in the current Farming Lease Law, are adopted in this with minimal changes. Apart from the equalisation of legal cohabitation and marriage, there are some legological and linguistic adjustments.
The heirs or successors of the deceased lessee can agree to continue the exploitation jointly.
What is new is that the heirs and successors must now announce the agreement they have concluded within three months. If the continuation was ratified by a judgement, the person continuing the exploitation must inform the lessor within three months of the judgement becoming final and conclusive. This adjustment improves transparency and ensures that the lessor remains aware of who the final user of the property is.
The provisions of the current Farming Lease Law are reproduced in this Farming Lease Decree, with legological and linguistic adjustments. The reference to legal cohabitants is also included here and the text is made gender-neutral.
Finally, it clarifies that a farming lease can only be renewed after timely notification.
If, at the death of the lessee, the lessor does not know which heir or heirs will continue the exploitation of the leased property, he may consider as operator the heirs or assignees who paid the last rent or, in the absence of payment, the heirs or successors who have their domicile in the registered office of the deceased lessee’s agricultural business.
If you would like more information on this subject, please do not hesitate to contact our specialists at info@be.Andersen.com or +32 (0)2 747 40 07.
I am looking for a specialist in

28.07.2026
•Commercial and Economic Law, Andersen in Belgium
Since 1 July 2026, low-value imports from third countries have been subject to a new customs regime. Council Regulation (EU) 2026/382 of 11 February 2026, amending Council Regulation (EC) No 1186/2009 as regards the removal of the customs duty relief based on a value threshold, abolishes the customs duty exemption that previously applied to consignments with an intrinsic value of less than €150. At the same time, it introduces, on a transitional basis, a flat-rate customs duty of €3 per item in certain situations. This reform constitutes one of the first components of the comprehensive overhaul of the EU Customs Union launched by the European Commission to adapt customs rules to the rapid expansion of global e-commerce.

10.07.2026
•Tax Law, Andersen in Belgium
The Programme Law of 30 May 2026 has introduced - with retroactive effect from 1 January 2026 - a new condition for applying the flat-rate deduction of expenses from the gross income derived from copyright and related rights.

08.07.2026
•Real Estate, Renting and Co-ownership, Andersen in Belgium
Can a landlord refuse a prospective tenant because their income is less than three times the rent? This question has been central to the debate on discrimination in the rental market for several years. In a judgment of 30 March 2026, the Council of State expressly addressed this so-called “three-times-rent rule” for the first time. The judgment provides important clarification for landlords, real estate investors and real estate agents. The Council of State does not hold that the three-times-rent rule is automatically permissible in all circumstances. It does, however, consider that an income requirement equal to three times the rent and charges is not, in itself, disproportionate and therefore cannot, without more, be regarded as prohibited discrimination on the basis of wealth.

08.07.2026
•Commercial and Economic Law, Andersen in Belgium
On 20 May 2026, the Belgian Council of State delivered three landmark judgments (Nos. 266.735, 266.736 and 266.737) holding that the Belgian prohibition on using the terms soldes, solden, sales, Schlussverkauf outside the statutory winter and summer sales periods is incompatible with European Union law and can no longer be enforced.