NL
EN
FR
Belgium
Back to articles

Court of Cassation confirms the personal disciplinary liability of each individual real estate agent, including those operating within a real estate group

January 14, 2026

By judgment of 18 December 2025, the Belgian Court of Cassation delivered a significant ruling in a disciplinary (disciplinary law / professional disciplinary proceedings) case against a real estate agent, with far-reaching consequences for the real estate profession.

Court of Cassation confirms the personal disciplinary liability of each individual real estate agent, including those operating within a real estate group

The case concerned the scope of the disciplinary liability of a real estate agent practicing within a larger real estate group.

The Court expressly confirmed a cornerstone of Belgian professional disciplinary law: any natural person registered as a real estate agent with the Belgian Institute of Real Estate Agents (BIV / Institut Professionnel des Agents Immobiliers) is personally and individually subject to disciplinary jurisdiction and remains fully liable under the applicable deontological rules for his or her professional conduct.

Such disciplinary liability cannot be transferred to, diluted by, or absorbed into the legal personality, internal organization, or hierarchical structure of a organization within which the professional activities are performed.


The case

For several years, a real estate agent had managed client files within his own office.

Following the acquisition of that office by a large real estate group, he continued his activities as a self-employed collaborator within that structure.

Following complaints relating, inter alia, to:

  • irregular contracts,
  • administrative shortcomings,
  • non-compliance with the professional rules,

disciplinary proceedings were initiated against him by the BIV.

The Chamber of Appeal had acquitted him on the grounds that the director of the real estate group had presented himself as the “deontologically responsible person” and had taken steps to remedy certain shortcomings.


Court of Cassation: responsibility cannot be outsourced

The Court of Cassation annuls that decision.

The Court held in clear terms that the fact that another real estate agent, a director, or a real estate group presents itself as the deontologically responsible party, or remedies certain shortcomings, has no bearing on the personal disciplinary liability of the agent who committed the infringements.

Disciplinary responsibility is:

  • personal,
  • non-transferable, and
  • attached to the agent’s registration with the BIV, rather than to the internal structure of the office or organization within which he operates. 


Why this judgment is so important?

This judgment puts an end to a practice whereby individual real estate agents could shield themselves behind:

  • a group structure,
  • a corporate vehicle, or
  • a formally designated “responsible person”, such as a director of the office within which they operate as self-employed collaborators.

The Court of Cassation makes it clear

The disciplinary court must assess the conduct of the individual who performed the act, rather than the organisational chart of the office.

This applies even where the agent:

  • is not a director,
  • acts under instructions,
  • or forms part of a larger network.


Implications for the sector

For real estate offices and groups, this means that:

  • each registered real estate agent bears their own disciplinary risk;
  • internal compliance structures do not shield agents from personal sanctions.

For clients, this means that:

  • they may hold the specific real estate agent who handled their file directly accountable;
  • and not merely an anonymous corporate entity.


Conclusion

The Court of Cassation thereby confirms a fundamental principle of the real estate profession:
Disciplinary liability is personal. Any individual acting as a real estate agent remains personally responsible for their conduct, regardless of the office or organizational structure in which they operate.

For a comprehensive overview of the legislation governing the real estate sector in Flanders and Brussels, you can consult the new “Vastgoedcodex“, published in collaboration with KnopsPublishing.
Buy a copy (print or download – Dutch) here: https://nl.knopspublishing.be/shop/boeken/burgerlijk-recht/vastgoedcodex-vlaanderen-brussel-2025-2026/


For more information on this topic, you can always contact the Real Estate team at Andersen in Belgium.
Ulrike Beuselinck (Partner – Mediator) & Koen De Puydt (Managing Partner)

tags
administrative shortcomings, court of cassation, irregular contracts, real estate agent, real estate group

Discover more about this topic?

I am looking for a specialist in

See more articles

Luc Herve joins Andersen as the firm opens a new office in Liège
NEWS FROM THE FIRM

05.10.2026

•

NEWS FROM THE FIRM

Luc Herve joins Andersen as the firm opens a new office in Liège

We are pleased to announce that Luc Herve's law firm has joined Andersen in Belgium, which opened a new office in Liège in September. Luc Herve joins Andersen as a Partner, bringing more than thirty years of experience in tax law, alongside his academic work and role as an accredited mediator. He is joined by Jérémy Lerusse, Associate. Both are members of the Liège Bar.

Read the article »
New Code of Ethics for Real Estate Agents: More Than a Mere Update

01.10.2026

•

Real Estate, Renting and Co-ownership, Andersen in Belgium

New Code of Ethics for Real Estate Agents: More Than a Mere Update

On 21 September 2026, the Royal Decree of 20 July 2026 approving the new Code of Ethics of the Professional Institute of Real Estate Agents (BIV) was published in the Belgian Official Gazette. The new Code enters into force on 1 October 2026, the date on which the 2018 regulations are repealed.

Read the article »
Financially contributing to a spatial implementation plan (RUP) poses a risk to your permit

29.09.2026

•

Urban Planning and Environmental Law, Andersen in Belgium

Financially contributing to a spatial implementation plan (RUP) poses a risk to your permit

A developer who contributes financially to the drafting of a spatial implementation plan may thereby jeopardize their integrated environmental permit. This follows a ruling by the Council for Permit Disputes dated September 17, 2026. The ruling addresses a practice that is widespread throughout Flanders.

Read the article »
Health organisations to become part of the public concerned in urban and environmental permitting procedures

17.09.2026

•

Urban Planning and Environmental Law, Andersen in Belgium

Health organisations to become part of the public concerned in urban and environmental permitting procedures

Non-governmental organisations dedicated to protecting human health will soon be able, like environmental protection organisations, to qualify as part of the “public concerned” in urban and/or environmental permitting procedures. This will broaden the range of organisations that may challenge a permitting decision, adding a new dimension to future permitting procedures.

Read the article »