NL
EN
FR
Belgium
Back to articles

Court of Cassation confirms the personal disciplinary liability of each individual real estate agent, including those operating within a real estate group

January 14, 2026

By judgment of 18 December 2025, the Belgian Court of Cassation delivered a significant ruling in a disciplinary (disciplinary law / professional disciplinary proceedings) case against a real estate agent, with far-reaching consequences for the real estate profession.

Court of Cassation confirms the personal disciplinary liability of each individual real estate agent, including those operating within a real estate group

The case concerned the scope of the disciplinary liability of a real estate agent practicing within a larger real estate group.

The Court expressly confirmed a cornerstone of Belgian professional disciplinary law: any natural person registered as a real estate agent with the Belgian Institute of Real Estate Agents (BIV / Institut Professionnel des Agents Immobiliers) is personally and individually subject to disciplinary jurisdiction and remains fully liable under the applicable deontological rules for his or her professional conduct.

Such disciplinary liability cannot be transferred to, diluted by, or absorbed into the legal personality, internal organization, or hierarchical structure of a organization within which the professional activities are performed.


The case

For several years, a real estate agent had managed client files within his own office.

Following the acquisition of that office by a large real estate group, he continued his activities as a self-employed collaborator within that structure.

Following complaints relating, inter alia, to:

  • irregular contracts,
  • administrative shortcomings,
  • non-compliance with the professional rules,

disciplinary proceedings were initiated against him by the BIV.

The Chamber of Appeal had acquitted him on the grounds that the director of the real estate group had presented himself as the “deontologically responsible person” and had taken steps to remedy certain shortcomings.


Court of Cassation: responsibility cannot be outsourced

The Court of Cassation annuls that decision.

The Court held in clear terms that the fact that another real estate agent, a director, or a real estate group presents itself as the deontologically responsible party, or remedies certain shortcomings, has no bearing on the personal disciplinary liability of the agent who committed the infringements.

Disciplinary responsibility is:

  • personal,
  • non-transferable, and
  • attached to the agent’s registration with the BIV, rather than to the internal structure of the office or organization within which he operates. 


Why this judgment is so important?

This judgment puts an end to a practice whereby individual real estate agents could shield themselves behind:

  • a group structure,
  • a corporate vehicle, or
  • a formally designated “responsible person”, such as a director of the office within which they operate as self-employed collaborators.

The Court of Cassation makes it clear

The disciplinary court must assess the conduct of the individual who performed the act, rather than the organisational chart of the office.

This applies even where the agent:

  • is not a director,
  • acts under instructions,
  • or forms part of a larger network.


Implications for the sector

For real estate offices and groups, this means that:

  • each registered real estate agent bears their own disciplinary risk;
  • internal compliance structures do not shield agents from personal sanctions.

For clients, this means that:

  • they may hold the specific real estate agent who handled their file directly accountable;
  • and not merely an anonymous corporate entity.


Conclusion

The Court of Cassation thereby confirms a fundamental principle of the real estate profession:
Disciplinary liability is personal. Any individual acting as a real estate agent remains personally responsible for their conduct, regardless of the office or organizational structure in which they operate.

For a comprehensive overview of the legislation governing the real estate sector in Flanders and Brussels, you can consult the new “Vastgoedcodex“, published in collaboration with KnopsPublishing.
Buy a copy (print or download – Dutch) here: https://nl.knopspublishing.be/shop/boeken/burgerlijk-recht/vastgoedcodex-vlaanderen-brussel-2025-2026/


For more information on this topic, you can always contact the Real Estate team at Andersen in Belgium.
Ulrike Beuselinck (Partner – Mediator) & Koen De Puydt (Managing Partner)

tags
administrative shortcomings, court of cassation, irregular contracts, real estate agent, real estate group

Discover more about this topic?

I am looking for a specialist in

See more articles

The end of the EUR 150 customs duty exemption: the European Union introduces a flat-rate EUR 3 duty on small parcels

28.07.2026

Commercial and Economic Law, Andersen in Belgium

The end of the EUR 150 customs duty exemption: the European Union introduces a flat-rate EUR 3 duty on small parcels

Since 1 July 2026, low-value imports from third countries have been subject to a new customs regime. Council Regulation (EU) 2026/382 of 11 February 2026, amending Council Regulation (EC) No 1186/2009 as regards the removal of the customs duty relief based on a value threshold, abolishes the customs duty exemption that previously applied to consignments with an intrinsic value of less than €150. At the same time, it introduces, on a transitional basis, a flat-rate customs duty of €3 per item in certain situations. This reform constitutes one of the first components of the comprehensive overhaul of the EU Customs Union launched by the European Commission to adapt customs rules to the rapid expansion of global e-commerce.

Read the article »
Copyright taxation: abolition of the flat-rate assessment of expenses

10.07.2026

Tax Law, Andersen in Belgium

Copyright taxation: abolition of the flat-rate assessment of expenses

The Programme Law of 30 May 2026 has introduced - with retroactive effect from 1 January 2026 - a new condition for applying the flat-rate deduction of expenses from the gross income derived from copyright and related rights.

Read the article »
The three-times-rent rule holds: Council of State clarifies tenant selection

08.07.2026

Real Estate, Renting and Co-ownership, Andersen in Belgium

The three-times-rent rule holds: Council of State clarifies tenant selection

Can a landlord refuse a prospective tenant because their income is less than three times the rent? This question has been central to the debate on discrimination in the rental market for several years. In a judgment of 30 March 2026, the Council of State expressly addressed this so-called “three-times-rent rule” for the first time. The judgment provides important clarification for landlords, real estate investors and real estate agents. The Council of State does not hold that the three-times-rent rule is automatically permissible in all circumstances. It does, however, consider that an income requirement equal to three times the rent and charges is not, in itself, disproportionate and therefore cannot, without more, be regarded as prohibited discrimination on the basis of wealth.

Read the article »
Sales Without Seasons? The Belgian Council of State Strikes Down the Ban on Advertising “Sales” Outside the Official Sales Periods

08.07.2026

Commercial and Economic Law, Andersen in Belgium

Sales Without Seasons? The Belgian Council of State Strikes Down the Ban on Advertising “Sales” Outside the Official Sales Periods

On 20 May 2026, the Belgian Council of State delivered three landmark judgments (Nos. 266.735, 266.736 and 266.737) holding that the Belgian prohibition on using the terms soldes, solden, sales, Schlussverkauf outside the statutory winter and summer sales periods is incompatible with European Union law and can no longer be enforced.

Read the article »