If one of the parties fails to fulfill their obligations, the termination of a farming lease agreement can be requested. In this article, we examine to what extent this is possible when the tenant or landlord does not comply with the terms of the farming lease agreement.

Flemish Farming Lease Decree explained (Part 6)
For the termination of a farming lease agreement because one of the parties fails to fulfill their obligations, one must look at the general rule of the Civil Code, specifically Article 1184 CC, both according to the Farming Lease Law and the Farming Lease Decree.
This is because a lease contract is a reciprocal contract. Consequently, each party has the choice, if the other party fails to meet their obligations, to either demand the execution of the agreement or to seek termination with compensation for damages.
In accordance with Article 1184 CC, the resolutive condition is always implicitly understood in a reciprocal contract, in the event that one of the parties fails to fulfill his obligation.
The Farming Lease Decree and the Farming Lease Law describe circumstances under which it is assumed that the tenant or landlord fails to fulfill their obligations and the other party can seek termination of the lease agreement in court.
The Farming Lease Decree provides a resolutive condition when the area specified in the agreement does not match reality (landlord):
“If a farming lease agreement attributes a smaller or larger area to the leased property than it actually has, the lease price is proportionally increased or decreased, starting from the first due date following the claim. The tenant also has the right to demand the termination of the farming lease agreement. The claim for reduction or increase of the farming lease price and the claim for termination of the farming lease agreement are only admissible if the difference between the actual area and the area stated in the agreement is at least one-twentieth.”
Additionally, the Farming Lease Decree incorporates the following resolutive condition for the landlord, which was already present in the old Farming Lease Law. The landlord may, depending on the circumstances, terminate the lease agreement if the tenant:
In the event of termination due to the tenant’s fault, the tenant will be liable for damages.
Note: A penalty clause and an explicit resolutive condition remain null and void.
Termination can therefore never occur automatically but must always be sought through legal proceedings.
In case you have questions about this item, do not hesitate to contact our specialists: +32 (0)2 747 40 07 or info@be.Andersen.com.
I am looking for a specialist in

01.10.2026
•Real Estate, Renting and Co-ownership, Andersen in Belgium
On 21 September 2026, the Royal Decree of 20 July 2026 approving the new Code of Ethics of the Professional Institute of Real Estate Agents (BIV) was published in the Belgian Official Gazette. The new Code enters into force on 1 October 2026, the date on which the 2018 regulations are repealed.

29.09.2026
•Urban Planning and Environmental Law, Andersen in Belgium
A developer who contributes financially to the drafting of a spatial implementation plan may thereby jeopardize their integrated environmental permit. This follows a ruling by the Council for Permit Disputes dated September 17, 2026. The ruling addresses a practice that is widespread throughout Flanders.

17.09.2026
•Urban Planning and Environmental Law, Andersen in Belgium
Non-governmental organisations dedicated to protecting human health will soon be able, like environmental protection organisations, to qualify as part of the “public concerned” in urban and/or environmental permitting procedures. This will broaden the range of organisations that may challenge a permitting decision, adding a new dimension to future permitting procedures.

08.09.2026
•Real Estate, Renting and Co-ownership, Andersen in Belgium
Are you renting out a home with serious quality defects? If so, you risk criminal prosecution. Starting today, penalties for renting substandard housing in Flanders will be significantly increased. A fine can reach up to 800,000 euros under aggravating circumstances. At the same time, judges will have greater discretion to tailor the penalty to the severity of the offense.