If one of the parties fails to fulfill their obligations, the termination of a farming lease agreement can be requested. In this article, we examine to what extent this is possible when the tenant or landlord does not comply with the terms of the farming lease agreement.

Flemish Farming Lease Decree explained (Part 6)
For the termination of a farming lease agreement because one of the parties fails to fulfill their obligations, one must look at the general rule of the Civil Code, specifically Article 1184 CC, both according to the Farming Lease Law and the Farming Lease Decree.
This is because a lease contract is a reciprocal contract. Consequently, each party has the choice, if the other party fails to meet their obligations, to either demand the execution of the agreement or to seek termination with compensation for damages.
In accordance with Article 1184 CC, the resolutive condition is always implicitly understood in a reciprocal contract, in the event that one of the parties fails to fulfill his obligation.
The Farming Lease Decree and the Farming Lease Law describe circumstances under which it is assumed that the tenant or landlord fails to fulfill their obligations and the other party can seek termination of the lease agreement in court.
The Farming Lease Decree provides a resolutive condition when the area specified in the agreement does not match reality (landlord):
“If a farming lease agreement attributes a smaller or larger area to the leased property than it actually has, the lease price is proportionally increased or decreased, starting from the first due date following the claim. The tenant also has the right to demand the termination of the farming lease agreement. The claim for reduction or increase of the farming lease price and the claim for termination of the farming lease agreement are only admissible if the difference between the actual area and the area stated in the agreement is at least one-twentieth.”
Additionally, the Farming Lease Decree incorporates the following resolutive condition for the landlord, which was already present in the old Farming Lease Law. The landlord may, depending on the circumstances, terminate the lease agreement if the tenant:
In the event of termination due to the tenant’s fault, the tenant will be liable for damages.
Note: A penalty clause and an explicit resolutive condition remain null and void.
Termination can therefore never occur automatically but must always be sought through legal proceedings.
In case you have questions about this item, do not hesitate to contact our specialists: +32 (0)2 747 40 07 or info@be.Andersen.com.
I am looking for a specialist in

28.07.2026
•Commercial and Economic Law, Andersen in Belgium
Since 1 July 2026, low-value imports from third countries have been subject to a new customs regime. Council Regulation (EU) 2026/382 of 11 February 2026, amending Council Regulation (EC) No 1186/2009 as regards the removal of the customs duty relief based on a value threshold, abolishes the customs duty exemption that previously applied to consignments with an intrinsic value of less than €150. At the same time, it introduces, on a transitional basis, a flat-rate customs duty of €3 per item in certain situations. This reform constitutes one of the first components of the comprehensive overhaul of the EU Customs Union launched by the European Commission to adapt customs rules to the rapid expansion of global e-commerce.

10.07.2026
•Tax Law, Andersen in Belgium
The Programme Law of 30 May 2026 has introduced - with retroactive effect from 1 January 2026 - a new condition for applying the flat-rate deduction of expenses from the gross income derived from copyright and related rights.

08.07.2026
•Real Estate, Renting and Co-ownership, Andersen in Belgium
Can a landlord refuse a prospective tenant because their income is less than three times the rent? This question has been central to the debate on discrimination in the rental market for several years. In a judgment of 30 March 2026, the Council of State expressly addressed this so-called “three-times-rent rule” for the first time. The judgment provides important clarification for landlords, real estate investors and real estate agents. The Council of State does not hold that the three-times-rent rule is automatically permissible in all circumstances. It does, however, consider that an income requirement equal to three times the rent and charges is not, in itself, disproportionate and therefore cannot, without more, be regarded as prohibited discrimination on the basis of wealth.

08.07.2026
•Commercial and Economic Law, Andersen in Belgium
On 20 May 2026, the Belgian Council of State delivered three landmark judgments (Nos. 266.735, 266.736 and 266.737) holding that the Belgian prohibition on using the terms soldes, solden, sales, Schlussverkauf outside the statutory winter and summer sales periods is incompatible with European Union law and can no longer be enforced.