In its judgment of 16 February 2026 (C.25.0185.N), the Court of Cassation held that the conditions included by a commercial tenant in an application for lease renewal pursuant to Article 14 of the Commercial Lease Act may relate exclusively to the new lease agreement and not to the ongoing lease.

A comercial tenant submitted a timely application for lease renewal.
In addition to proposing new lease terms for the following period, the application also included an additional reduction of the rent for the period already in progress.
The appellate court held that such a condition did not affect the validity of the renewal application.
The Court of Cassation set aside that decision, referring to the requirements of Article 14 of the Commercial Lease Act.
Article 14 is of a strictly formalistic nature.
Pursuant to this provision, a valid renewal application requires, inter alia:
The Court recalled that, in the absence of a valid response from the landlord, the renewal takes place under the conditions proposed by the tenant.
It follows, according to the Court, that these conditions must comply with the law and therefore may relate solely to the new lease agreement.
A condition seeking to amend the rent applicable to the ongoing lease falls outside that framework.
Article 14 of the Commercial Lease Act governs the renewal of the lease, which entails the conclusion of a new lease.
By contrast, a revision of the current rent is governed by Article 6 of the Commercial Lease Act and is subject to strict conditions.
The renewal procedure cannot be used as a backdoor mechanism to impose amendments to the ongoing lease agreement, such as, in this case, an adjustment of the amount of the rent.
With this judgment, the Court of Cassation once again confirms the strict nature of Article 14 of the Commercial Lease Act.
Failure to comply with the wording and requirements of this provision – for example, by conflating the concepts of renewal and rent review – may jeopardize the validity of the application for renewal.
For a comprehensive overview of the legislation governing the real estate sector in Flanders and Brussels, you can consult the new “Vastgoedcodex“, published in collaboration with KnopsPublishing.
Buy a copy (print or download – Dutch) here: https://nl.knopspublishing.be/shop/boeken/burgerlijk-recht/vastgoedcodex-vlaanderen-brussel-2025-2026/
Need assistance with drafting a comprehensive model of an offer, private deed, or legal advice on real estate transactions or brokerage agreements in general?
Feel free to get in touch. Andersen’s Real Estate team is happy to assist you further.
Ulrike Beuselinck (Partner – Mediator)
I am looking for a specialist in

28.07.2026
•Commercial and Economic Law, Andersen in Belgium
Since 1 July 2026, low-value imports from third countries have been subject to a new customs regime. Council Regulation (EU) 2026/382 of 11 February 2026, amending Council Regulation (EC) No 1186/2009 as regards the removal of the customs duty relief based on a value threshold, abolishes the customs duty exemption that previously applied to consignments with an intrinsic value of less than €150. At the same time, it introduces, on a transitional basis, a flat-rate customs duty of €3 per item in certain situations. This reform constitutes one of the first components of the comprehensive overhaul of the EU Customs Union launched by the European Commission to adapt customs rules to the rapid expansion of global e-commerce.

10.07.2026
•Tax Law, Andersen in Belgium
The Programme Law of 30 May 2026 has introduced - with retroactive effect from 1 January 2026 - a new condition for applying the flat-rate deduction of expenses from the gross income derived from copyright and related rights.

08.07.2026
•Real Estate, Renting and Co-ownership, Andersen in Belgium
Can a landlord refuse a prospective tenant because their income is less than three times the rent? This question has been central to the debate on discrimination in the rental market for several years. In a judgment of 30 March 2026, the Council of State expressly addressed this so-called “three-times-rent rule” for the first time. The judgment provides important clarification for landlords, real estate investors and real estate agents. The Council of State does not hold that the three-times-rent rule is automatically permissible in all circumstances. It does, however, consider that an income requirement equal to three times the rent and charges is not, in itself, disproportionate and therefore cannot, without more, be regarded as prohibited discrimination on the basis of wealth.

08.07.2026
•Commercial and Economic Law, Andersen in Belgium
On 20 May 2026, the Belgian Council of State delivered three landmark judgments (Nos. 266.735, 266.736 and 266.737) holding that the Belgian prohibition on using the terms soldes, solden, sales, Schlussverkauf outside the statutory winter and summer sales periods is incompatible with European Union law and can no longer be enforced.