Flemish Farming Lease Decree explained (Part 9). This article delves into the methods of fulfilling farming lease payments, the existence of a maximum lease price, the potential for disputes over payment, and the conditions under which a farming lease price can be revised or increased.

The Farming Lease Law establishes the rules for farming lease payments, often creating practical challenges by allowing payment in kind or services. The judiciary has broadly interpreted these provisions, often resulting in parties unintentionally falling under the jurisdiction of the Farming Lease Law. To limit this broad interpretation, the Farming Lease Decree stipulates that payment can only be made in cash, regardless of the provisions of the farming lease agreement.
The lessor or their authorized representative is obliged to provide the lessee with a receipt for the lease payment received, specifying the actual amount paid. Notwithstanding any conflicting agreement, the lessee may pay the lease price via postal assignment, postal check, money order, or bank transfer to the account of the lessor, one of the lessors, or their agents. This method of payment serves as proof of payment, unless contested by the lessor, who must bring the dispute before the court within six months of the payment date, under penalty of forfeiture. Proof of payment and the amount thereof may be established by any legal means, including witness testimony and presumptions.
The law regulating farming lease prices previously established the rules for determining the maximum allowable lease prices. The maximum price was calculated by multiplying the cadastral income of the leased property by a farming lease price coefficient, set per province and agricultural region by the farming lease price committees.
The rules for establishing these committees are included in the Farming Lease Decree, consolidating all statutory rules regarding leasing into a single text, thus enhancing clarity. The rules concerning the limitation of farming lease prices are partially incorporated into the Farming Lease Decree. New provisions grant the farming lease price committees an expanded basis for negotiating new farming lease price coefficients.
Henceforth, these coefficients will be determined based on two criteria:
a. The ratio between the average profitability of businesses in each agricultural region over a three-year period preceding the last year of each term, and the average profitability during the same period of the previous term;
b. The unrealized increase or decrease in value resulting from land price changes during the three-year period preceding the last year of each term.
The first criterion is decisive. Consequently, an increase in unrealized land value should have a price-reducing effect, while a decrease should have a price-increasing effect, as the lessee will eventually realize a higher return from the increased property value. This is particularly relevant for contracts with a termination option for alienation.
Under the Farming Lease Decree, the farming lease price for agreements executed by authentic deed may be increased as follows:
After the initial usage period, the lease price reverts to the maximum allowable lease price. In the context of career leases, the maximum lease price may be increased by 50% for land and 25% for buildings.
The Farming Lease Decree also includes provisions for the review of farming lease prices. Either party may request a review of the price of an ongoing farming lease if it deviates from the current maximum allowable farming lease price. If a lessee requests a review of a lease price that exceeds the maximum allowable price, the lease is not nullified; instead, the price is adjusted to the maximum allowable amount.
The lessor’s request for a farming lease price adjustment takes effect only on lease prices due after the notification date of the price adjustment. Overpayments above the maximum allowable lease price may be refunded to the lessee upon request, applicable only to lease payments that have accrued and been paid in the five years preceding the request. The lessee’s claim for a refund expires one year after the date they vacate the leased property.
If you require more information, please do not hesitate to contact our specialists via info@be.Andersen.com or +32 (0)2 747 40 07.
I am looking for a specialist in

28.07.2026
•Commercial and Economic Law, Andersen in Belgium
Since 1 July 2026, low-value imports from third countries have been subject to a new customs regime. Council Regulation (EU) 2026/382 of 11 February 2026, amending Council Regulation (EC) No 1186/2009 as regards the removal of the customs duty relief based on a value threshold, abolishes the customs duty exemption that previously applied to consignments with an intrinsic value of less than €150. At the same time, it introduces, on a transitional basis, a flat-rate customs duty of €3 per item in certain situations. This reform constitutes one of the first components of the comprehensive overhaul of the EU Customs Union launched by the European Commission to adapt customs rules to the rapid expansion of global e-commerce.

10.07.2026
•Tax Law, Andersen in Belgium
The Programme Law of 30 May 2026 has introduced - with retroactive effect from 1 January 2026 - a new condition for applying the flat-rate deduction of expenses from the gross income derived from copyright and related rights.

08.07.2026
•Real Estate, Renting and Co-ownership, Andersen in Belgium
Can a landlord refuse a prospective tenant because their income is less than three times the rent? This question has been central to the debate on discrimination in the rental market for several years. In a judgment of 30 March 2026, the Council of State expressly addressed this so-called “three-times-rent rule” for the first time. The judgment provides important clarification for landlords, real estate investors and real estate agents. The Council of State does not hold that the three-times-rent rule is automatically permissible in all circumstances. It does, however, consider that an income requirement equal to three times the rent and charges is not, in itself, disproportionate and therefore cannot, without more, be regarded as prohibited discrimination on the basis of wealth.

08.07.2026
•Commercial and Economic Law, Andersen in Belgium
On 20 May 2026, the Belgian Council of State delivered three landmark judgments (Nos. 266.735, 266.736 and 266.737) holding that the Belgian prohibition on using the terms soldes, solden, sales, Schlussverkauf outside the statutory winter and summer sales periods is incompatible with European Union law and can no longer be enforced.