Under the Farming Lease Law, parties had significant freedom, which often caused difficulties in calculating the termination compensation. This article examines how this is regulated in the Farming Lease Decree.

Flemish Farming Lease Decree explained (Part 7)
Due to the extensive freedom under the Farming Lease Law, parties often used the scales established by provincial agricultural chambers to calculate the termination compensation or agreed that the termination allowance would be twice the farming lease price. This not only caused confusion and significant regional differences but also led to disputes between the parties.
For this reason, the Farming Lease Decree opted for a fixed compensation.
In the written farming lease agreement, a fixed compensation can be included, which may not be less than three times the maximum allowable farming lease price. The lessee whose farming lease ends then receives compensation from the lessor for the straw, manure, and turnips left behind upon departure, the buildings already realized, as well as for the improvement in the cleanliness of the lands.
If the farming lease agreement does not provide for a fixed compensation, the arrangement that already existed in the Farming Lease Law applies. The compensation then is equal to the current value at the end of the farming lease of the straw, manure, turnips, and the stock of realized buildings and improvement of the land, taking into account the destination of the leased property. However, the compensation may not exceed the amount of the costs incurred by the lessee.
If the lessee received straw, manure, turnips, or other provisions or benefits free of charge at the beginning of the farming lease and can prove this, an account will be made at the end of the lease regarding the value of the difference between the quantities at the time the lessee leaves the leased property.
When the lessor incurs a loss due to a lack of cleanliness or maintenance of the leased property, or any other default by the lessee, the latter owes an amount that will be set off against the compensation the lessee is entitled to.
In cases where the lessor can terminate the lease agreement at any time with a short notice period of three months, the lessee, upon leaving the leased property, is entitled to an additional compensation for the damage suffered, in addition to the termination compensation. The farming lease agreement may be terminated for one of the following reasons:
The additional compensation is calculated based on the business loss suffered by the lessee regarding animals and equipment, taking into account (i) the area of the lands withdrawn from the agricultural business, (ii) the loss of enjoyment during the years before the expiration of the current lease period, but not less than two or more than four years, and (iii) the loss resulting from the depreciation of the remaining buildings and lands.
If the lessee and lessor have not agreed on a fixed compensation or cannot reach an agreement on the extent of the compensation, the court will determine the extent of the compensation.
To this end, the court takes into account the compensation to which the lessee, whose lease is ending, is entitled and the benefits granted by the lessor to the lessee concerning the buildings he has constructed and the works he has carried out.
Pending the judicial decision and before the lessee leaves the property, he must receive a provisional compensation from the lessor equal to the amount of the number of years of the lease before the expiration of the farming lease agreement, which should not be less than four and not more than eight years.
The lessee may waive the compensation to which he is entitled only after the termination of the farming lease agreement. This is only possible by authentic deed or by a declaration made by the lessee before the court.
In case you have questions about this item, do not hesitate to contact our specialists: +32 (0)2 747 40 07 or info@be.Andersen.com.
I am looking for a specialist in

28.07.2026
•Commercial and Economic Law, Andersen in Belgium
Since 1 July 2026, low-value imports from third countries have been subject to a new customs regime. Council Regulation (EU) 2026/382 of 11 February 2026, amending Council Regulation (EC) No 1186/2009 as regards the removal of the customs duty relief based on a value threshold, abolishes the customs duty exemption that previously applied to consignments with an intrinsic value of less than €150. At the same time, it introduces, on a transitional basis, a flat-rate customs duty of €3 per item in certain situations. This reform constitutes one of the first components of the comprehensive overhaul of the EU Customs Union launched by the European Commission to adapt customs rules to the rapid expansion of global e-commerce.

10.07.2026
•Tax Law, Andersen in Belgium
The Programme Law of 30 May 2026 has introduced - with retroactive effect from 1 January 2026 - a new condition for applying the flat-rate deduction of expenses from the gross income derived from copyright and related rights.

08.07.2026
•Real Estate, Renting and Co-ownership, Andersen in Belgium
Can a landlord refuse a prospective tenant because their income is less than three times the rent? This question has been central to the debate on discrimination in the rental market for several years. In a judgment of 30 March 2026, the Council of State expressly addressed this so-called “three-times-rent rule” for the first time. The judgment provides important clarification for landlords, real estate investors and real estate agents. The Council of State does not hold that the three-times-rent rule is automatically permissible in all circumstances. It does, however, consider that an income requirement equal to three times the rent and charges is not, in itself, disproportionate and therefore cannot, without more, be regarded as prohibited discrimination on the basis of wealth.

08.07.2026
•Commercial and Economic Law, Andersen in Belgium
On 20 May 2026, the Belgian Council of State delivered three landmark judgments (Nos. 266.735, 266.736 and 266.737) holding that the Belgian prohibition on using the terms soldes, solden, sales, Schlussverkauf outside the statutory winter and summer sales periods is incompatible with European Union law and can no longer be enforced.