NL
EN
FR
Belgium
Back to articles

Supreme Court Clarifies Deadline Calculation for Eviction Compensation under Commercial Lease Law

June 18, 2025

On March 28, 2025, the Belgian Supreme Court clarified how the expiration period must be calculated for a tenant seeking eviction compensation when a commercial lease is not renewed.

Supreme Court Clarifies Deadline Calculation for Eviction Compensation under Commercial Lease Law

Case Background

The tenant, who operated a hospitality business, requested a renewal of the commercial lease. The landlords refused, citing their intention to use the premises themselves. In such cases, the law prohibits the launch of a similar commercial activity unless the landlord compensates the tenant.

When it became apparent that the landlords still intended to open a hospitality business in the premises, the tenant filed a claim for eviction compensation. However, the court dismissed the claim as being filed too late.


Legal Framework and Dispute

According to Article 28 of the Belgian Commercial Lease Act, such a claim must be filed within one year from the date it becomes evident that the landlord did not take personal possession of the property within six months.

The legal debate centered on whether the deadline should be calculated under the Judicial Code, which allows extensions if a deadline falls on a weekend or public holiday – or under the Old Civil Code, which does not include such flexibility.


Court Rulings

The tenant submitted an additional claim on June 1, 2022, arguing that the landlords had neither taken personal possession of the property within six months nor maintained it for two years as required.

The Court of Appeal ruled that this concerns an expiration period within the meaning of Articles 2260–2261 of the old Civil Code, and not a procedural deadline to which Articles 51–54 of the Judicial Code would apply. The claim was therefore dismissed as untimely.

The plaintiff appealed to the Supreme Court, arguing that the deadlines under the Judicial Code should apply. The Supreme Court rejected this argument and upheld the ruling of the Court of Appeal.


Deadline Analysis

The commercial lease ended on November 30, 2020. The landlords were required to take personal possession of the premises by May 30, 2021, at the latest. The one-year expiration period for the tenant to file a claim for eviction compensation thus began on that date, ending on May 30, 2022.

Even if one assumed the provisions of the Judicial Code applied, the claim filed on June 1, 2022, would still be too late. In that scenario, the period would have begun on May 31, 2021 (the day after the discovery), and the deadline would have been May 31, 2022 – making the June 1 filing outside the permitted period either way.


Conclusion

The Supreme Court confirmed the claim was filed too late and rejected it based on Article 25, first paragraph, 6° of the Commercial Lease Act.

Key takeaway: In eviction compensation cases under the Commercial Lease Act, strict expiration periods apply. These are mandatory deadlines and are interpreted narrowly. The extension rules of the Judicial Code do not apply when the act in question is not procedural in nature.

Discover more about this topic?

I am looking for a specialist in

See more articles

Permanent residence not a condition for inclusion of a dwelling in the permit register
News

12.11.2025

Urban Planning and Environmental Law

Permanent residence not a condition for inclusion of a dwelling in the permit register

The Council for Permit Disputes (RvVb) confirms that permanent residence is not a requirement for inclusion as a dwelling in the permit register. It is sufficient that the construction is primarily intended for residential use. A request for inclusion in the permit register may therefore not be refused on the grounds that permanent residence has not been demonstrated.

Read the article »
No financial charges may be imposed in an environmental permit without an urban planning regulation.
News

07.11.2025

Urban Planning and Environmental Law

No financial charges may be imposed in an environmental permit without an urban planning regulation.

The Council for Permit Disputes (RvVb) annulled, on 9 October 2025, a financial charge imposed in a decision granting an environmental permit. Such a charge may, since 2024, only be imposed on the basis of an urban planning regulation within the meaning of Articles 2.3.1 and 2.3.2 of the Flemish Code for Spatial Planning (VCRO). Prior to the amendment of the Decree, the Environmental Permit Decree did provide that such a financial charge could be imposed by the permitting authority and under what conditions, but it was not required that a regulation be included in an urban planning ordinance.

Read the article »
Proposed decree: EIA screening transferred to higher government
News

06.11.2025

Administrative Law and Public Procurement

Proposed decree: EIA screening transferred to higher government

Local authorities face a dilemma: they want to invest in public construction projects, but are no longer allowed to assess their own projects when these have a significant impact on the environment. A new draft decree aims to break the deadlock, but at the same time raises questions about how independent the assessment will really be when it is simply shifted to another political level.

Read the article »
Tightening of public procurement regulations following new European threshold amounts from January 1, 2026
News

04.11.2025

Administrative Law and Public Procurement

Tightening of public procurement regulations following new European threshold amounts from January 1, 2026

On October 23, 2025, the new European threshold amounts that tighten public procurement regulations were published in the European Official Journal. When awarding public procurements, the contracting authority must take into account a number of threshold amounts.

Read the article »