In a previous article we were somewhat giggly about influencers but yet honesty compels us to say that influencer advertising and marketing is one of the fastest growing industries of the past decade. Companies have become aware of the huge impact influencers have on consumers. If you have teenagers of your own, you will no doubt have noticed this already. What is often ignored, however, is that influencers must follow a lot of rules and that companies that use influencers can be held responsible for any violations committed by them. Below, we outline the main rules and principles related to marketing through influencers.

Unlike France or Italy, for example, Belgium has no specific legislation regarding influencers or social media marketing. The question therefore arises as to which rules influencers must comply with in Belgium.
According to Belgian (and European) law, influencers are considered “an undertaking” when they advertise or sell products on a regular basis and receive remuneration for doing so.
Beware, this does not require ‘influencing’ or ‘social media content creation’ to be your full-time job. It is sufficient that you do this with some regularity.
Nor is it necessary for the compensation to consist of ‘money’. Other benefits the influencer receives from its commercial partners, such as discounts, gifts, free goods or invitations to events, are also considered ‘compensation’.
In the absence of specific legislation on influencers in Belgium, these ‘professional influencers’ must abide by the same rules as any other undertaking. However, for influencers, specific interpretation of these rules should be made on a regular basis.
An influencer that qualifies as an ‘undertaking’ must – like any other undertaking – be registered with the Crossroads Bank for Enterprises (CBE) and have a company number.
If necessary, this number will also count as a VAT number. Indeed, as an undertaking, the influencer will have to comply with VAT legislation. We do point out that as a so-called ‘small business’ with a maximum annual turnover of €25,000 excluding VAT, you are eligible for a VAT exemption.
Either way, as an undertaking, you will have to issue invoices to your clients and declare your income and pay taxes on it. The latter also applies to so-called benefits in kind such as discounts, gifts, free goods or invitations to events you may receive as an influencer. The value of these benefits is also income and must therefore also be declared as part of your tax return.
In addition to these tax obligations, every professional influencer – like any other undertaking – must also disclose his/her business details. This means that an influencer must disclose his/her legal business details on his/her social media pages and website(s). This includes name, company number, business address and an email address.
The influencer may fulfil this obligation by referring to his/her website on his/her social media channels. In this case, the influencer must include his/her company details on this website and ensure that it is easily, directly and permanently available to the public. This can be at the bottom of the website or in an appropriate section (e.g. on the contact page).
Many influencers work from home and their business address is also their private address. If they want to avoid their private address being made public, they can use the services of a recognized business center and open/register a second ‘branch’ with that business center. They can then register one branch at the home address and one branch at the address of the approved business center with the address of the second branch at the approved business center being communicated on the website(s) and social media pages as the ‘business address’ instead of the private address.
As mentioned above, influencers should follow the same rules as all other undertakings.
Influencers must also ensure, in the context of their social media content, that they respect the rules on consumer protection and unfair commercial practices.
We summarise below the main rules specific to influencers.
Influencers often combine commercial with non-commercial posts. Users may thus think that a particular post reflects the influencer’s own opinion about a product, when in fact the influencer is paid to promote this product. Thus, the commercial nature of posts is not always clear and may therefore mislead consumers. Such can thus be considered an unfair market practice. Consequently, it should be clear to consumers when influencers are advertising and when they are not.
Since commercial posts are considered advertising, influencers should disclose the commercial nature of these posts. Economic Inspection applies the following rules regarding this mandatory disclosure:
Even if your post is sponsored, you should still use the tags “advertising”, “ad” or “publicity” if that better reflects the content or commercial nature of your post and is clearer to the target audience.
It is also advised – if available – to use the labels provided by the platforms themselves, such as Instagram’s “Paid partnership” label and YouTube’s “Contains paid promotion” label.
A post is considered a “commercial post” and therefore advertising when the influencer receives compensation for this post. We hereby reiterate what we have already mentioned above regarding compensation, which does not have to consist of money but can just as easily consist of a discount, free goods or other gifts.
Nor does it matter whether there is an actual agreement between the influencer and the company to qualify a post as advertising.
Just because the social media content is created and published by the influencer does not mean that the company for whom it is advertised cannot be held responsible for its content.
When companies contract with influencers, they have a responsibility to ensure that the content of the social media content complies with the provisions relating to unfair market practices and misleading advertising. The president of the Enterprise Court of Antwerp has already ruled that even if a company leaves the initiative and creation of the advertising to a third party, e.g. an influencer, that company still remains responsible for the content of this advertising.
Thus, when a company uses the services of an influencer to advertise and publish for it, the company may be held liable for a breach by the influencer of the provisions on unfair market practices and consumer law.
We therefore recommend that companies using influencers develop a written policy for advertising on social media and ensure that influencers used by the company comply with and respect this policy.
Do not hesitate in contacting our specialists should you have questions about this item: +32 (0)2 747 40 07 or info@be.Andersen.com.
I am looking for a specialist in

05.10.2026
•NEWS FROM THE FIRM
We are pleased to announce that Luc Herve's law firm has joined Andersen in Belgium, which opened a new office in Liège in September. Luc Herve joins Andersen as a Partner, bringing more than thirty years of experience in tax law, alongside his academic work and role as an accredited mediator. He is joined by Jérémy Lerusse, Associate. Both are members of the Liège Bar.

01.10.2026
•Real Estate, Renting and Co-ownership, Andersen in Belgium
On 21 September 2026, the Royal Decree of 20 July 2026 approving the new Code of Ethics of the Professional Institute of Real Estate Agents (BIV) was published in the Belgian Official Gazette. The new Code enters into force on 1 October 2026, the date on which the 2018 regulations are repealed.

29.09.2026
•Urban Planning and Environmental Law, Andersen in Belgium
A developer who contributes financially to the drafting of a spatial implementation plan may thereby jeopardize their integrated environmental permit. This follows a ruling by the Council for Permit Disputes dated September 17, 2026. The ruling addresses a practice that is widespread throughout Flanders.

17.09.2026
•Urban Planning and Environmental Law, Andersen in Belgium
Non-governmental organisations dedicated to protecting human health will soon be able, like environmental protection organisations, to qualify as part of the “public concerned” in urban and/or environmental permitting procedures. This will broaden the range of organisations that may challenge a permitting decision, adding a new dimension to future permitting procedures.