A new EU requirement will soon oblige online traders to make the exercise of the consumer’s right of withdrawal as simple and accessible as the online conclusion of the contract itself. Below, we explain what this obligation entails and what you should do to prepare.

Directive (EU) 2023/2673, amending Directive 2011/83/EU as regards financial services contracts concluded at a distance and repealing Directive 2002/65/EC, inserts a new Article 11a into the Consumer Rights Directive. This introduces a new obligation for traders concluding distance contracts with consumers through online interfaces.
Although the Directive was adopted in the context of financial services contracts concluded at a distance, the new mechanism is broader: it expressly extends to all distance contracts for the provision of goods and services where a right of withdrawal already exists.
The key principle is straightforward: consumers must be able to withdraw from a contract online just as easily as they concluded it online.
This new mechanism does not replace or modify the existing withdrawal rules. It simply adds a new, dedicated online option alongside them.
The Directive requires traders to implement a specific, two-step online withdrawal function.
The withdrawal function must be clearly labelled, for example with the wording “withdraw from contract here” or another equally unambiguous formulation. It must be prominently displayed, continuously available throughout the withdrawal period, and easily accessible. Consumers should not have to take unnecessary steps to find it, such as downloading an application they did not use to conclude the contract. Traders may also make the withdrawal function accessible via a direct hyperlink.
The withdrawal process must consist of two steps:
Once the consumer clicks the confirmation button, the trader must send an acknowledgement of receipt – on a durable medium and without undue delay – containing the content of the withdrawal request and the date and time it was submitted.
A consumer is considered to have exercised their right of withdrawal in time if the online withdrawal statement is submitted before the expiry of the applicable withdrawal period.
The withdrawal function goes beyond contractual wording. It directly affects how websites and applications are designed and operated.
Member States were required to transpose the Directive into national law by 19 December 2025. The new rules will apply from 19 June 2026.
At the time of writing, Belgium has not yet transposed the Directive into national law. The new provisions will most likely be integrated into the Belgian Code of Economic Law. In the meantime, online traders should not wait for Belgian legislation to be finalised before taking action, particularly given that several neighbouring Member States have already transposed the Directive and provide for significant sanctions for non-compliance.
We therefore recommend that online traders already review their websites, applications and withdrawal procedures to ensure full compliance by the deadline.
We will continue to monitor developments and keep you informed of any further updates on this matter.
I am looking for a specialist in

05.10.2026
•NEWS FROM THE FIRM
We are pleased to announce that Luc Herve's law firm has joined Andersen in Belgium, which opened a new office in Liège in September. Luc Herve joins Andersen as a Partner, bringing more than thirty years of experience in tax law, alongside his academic work and role as an accredited mediator. He is joined by Jérémy Lerusse, Associate. Both are members of the Liège Bar.

01.10.2026
•Real Estate, Renting and Co-ownership, Andersen in Belgium
On 21 September 2026, the Royal Decree of 20 July 2026 approving the new Code of Ethics of the Professional Institute of Real Estate Agents (BIV) was published in the Belgian Official Gazette. The new Code enters into force on 1 October 2026, the date on which the 2018 regulations are repealed.

29.09.2026
•Urban Planning and Environmental Law, Andersen in Belgium
A developer who contributes financially to the drafting of a spatial implementation plan may thereby jeopardize their integrated environmental permit. This follows a ruling by the Council for Permit Disputes dated September 17, 2026. The ruling addresses a practice that is widespread throughout Flanders.

17.09.2026
•Urban Planning and Environmental Law, Andersen in Belgium
Non-governmental organisations dedicated to protecting human health will soon be able, like environmental protection organisations, to qualify as part of the “public concerned” in urban and/or environmental permitting procedures. This will broaden the range of organisations that may challenge a permitting decision, adding a new dimension to future permitting procedures.