NL
EN
FR
Belgium
Home/ Litigation and Arbitration

Litigation and Arbitration

Andersen provides strategic pre-litigation advice to prevent disputes and offers comprehensive representation in litigation, arbitration, and alternative dispute resolution methods such as mediation and negotiation. Their expertise spans business, shareholder, contractual, construction, intellectual property, and employment disputes.

Our lawyers aim to provide strategic legal advice at the early stages of a problem

To prevent our clients becoming involved in disputes in court, it is very important to provide strategic legal advice at the early stages of a problem.
Where litigation issues arise, we always keep an eye on the economic outcome, and have extensive experience in alternative dispute resolution such as mediation, arbitration, conciliation and negotiation. 
Our actions always start with pre-action strategic advice and risk assessment. 
If this becomes inevitable, we are committed to fight and act on behalf of our clients in any kind of dispute resolution.


We meet challenges
head on

We assist our clients at all stages of contentious matters:

  • business litigation
  • shareholder litigation
  • commercial law and market practices disputes
  • contractual disputes
  • construction and building disputes
  • intellectual property disputes
  • employment disputes
  • etc.

Need a specialist in this field?

I am looking for a specialist in

Latest news on this expertise

Company directors  and dismemberment of property: the right reflexes to acquire.
News

25.04.2025

Tax Law

Company directors  and dismemberment of property: the right reflexes to acquire.

Company directors often use dismemberment of property to promote the acquisition of real estate intended either to house their company's offices, or to finance the purchase of a building intended to be made available to them as a benefit of any kind. These mechanisms are perfectly legal, although not much appreciated by the tax authorities, who control them very regularly, if not systematically.

Read the article »
Donor children – update following the federal coalition agreement for 2025-2029
News

03.02.2025

Litigation and Arbitration

Donor children – update following the federal coalition agreement for 2025-2029

The new federal coalition agreement for 2025-2029 acknowledges that the legal provisions regarding professional secrecy and the anonymity of sperm donors should no longer result in a donor child being unable to obtain any identifying or non-identifying information from the fertility center and states that "knowing one's own origins can be important for the identity formation of donor children."

Read the article »
Court forces sperm donor to undergo DNA testing
Case

06.12.2024

Litigation and Arbitration

Court forces sperm donor to undergo DNA testing

In a previous article, we discussed an important judgement from the Constitutional Court regarding the rights of donor children. In said article, we already referred to a groundbreaking judgement by the Court of first instance of West-Vlaanderen, section Bruges from June 23, 2023. Through this judgement, our firm obtained an order requiring the presumed donor of a donor child to undergo DNA testing, subject to a penalty payment. A recent article in the Journal of Family Law titled “Mirror, mirror on the wall, who will put an end to donor anonymity in the land?” also refers to this judgement. The Paternity Center also published an official statement in which they advocate for the abolishment of donor anonymity, referring to, inter alia, the judgement of June 23, 2023. Given this renewed focus on the rights of donor children, we will further elaborate on the judgement of June 2023 in this article.

Read the article »
Donor children have a right to obtain information regarding their donor
Case

06.11.2024

Litigation and Arbitration

Donor children have a right to obtain information regarding their donor

The Constitutional Court recently ruled that the legal provisions on professional secrecy and anonymity of sperm donors should no longer prevent a donor child from obtaining any identifying or non-identifying information from the fertility clinic. In this article, we briefly discuss the implications of this ruling.

Read the article »